PHI-1012-001: Ethics

This abbreviated syllabus must be read together with the material within the Institutional Policies Module of the class D2L shell. Combined, these documents constitute the entire syllabus required for this course.

Guaranteed Transfer (GT) Pathways Course Statement:

The Colorado Commission on Higher Education has approved PHI 1012 for inclusion in the Guaranteed Transfer (GT) Pathways program in the GT-AH3 category. For transferring students, successful completion with a minimum C‒ grade guarantees transfer and application of credit in this GT Pathways category. For more information on the GT Pathways program, go to https://highered.colorado.gov/academics/transfers/gtpathways/curriculum.html.

Welcome!

Welcome to Ethics! In this course we will be delving into core issues about values, rules, and how we should live life. When (if ever) are sacrifices permissible or even mandatory? What sorts of moral consideration do other people/animals/environments deserve? Is there a true, objective morality, or is it all subjective/relative to culture? What constraints should there be on speech, capital punishment, abortion, euthanasia, AI, or immigration (just to name a few)? In this class, we will learn about major approaches to these questions and more. More importantly, we will develop the skills to analyze and evaluate these approaches.

Premier quantum physicist Sean Carroll loves to point out that physics is way easier than ethics. Physics is clean, clear, and under control. Ethics, on the other hand, is blurry, difficult, and extremely hard to do well. We have to work harder. Humans comprise the most complicated systems in the (known) universe. It is no wonder that figuring out the right ways for us to live is challenging.

In this class, we explore some of the biggest questions in ethics and hone the skills that are required to answer them. These include some of the most classic questions in ethics: Is morality objective? What is valuable? What matters more: rules or results? How do we get better at being ethical?

We will discuss each chapter over the course of two weeks. That means you should be reading them at least twice. By the end of the two weeks, you should feel very familiar with the chapter and confident in taking the associated quiz.

The number one tip for success in this class: ENGAGE — attend class, discuss with classmates, stay up to date with D2L, and above all reach out if you run into trouble.

There is a bonus quiz in D2L based on this syllabus. It is the best way to start on a good foot as it gives your grade an early cushion and helps you familiarize yourself with what the course will be like.

Do not hesitate to reach out with questions on course logistics or content! I am here to help!

Course Information

Course Title:Ethics
Credits:3
Course Description (from CCNS):

Examines human life, experience, and thought to discover and develop the principles and values for pursuing a more fulfilled existence. This course examines ethical theories designed to both justify moral judgments, as well as apply these ethical theories to a selection of personal and social issues in the world today. This is a statewide Guaranteed Transfer course in the GT-AH3 category.

Semester & Year:Fall 2026
Meeting Location:Cherry Creek (DCHR) 145
Times & Days:Monday/Wednesday, 12:30-1:45pm
Start Date:17 August
End Date:7 December
Last date to drop with a refund:2 September
Last date to withdraw:12 November
Fall Holidays / Break:7 September – Labor Day – No classes, campus/offices closed; 23 November – 27 November – Fall Break – No classes, campus/offices open except Thursday, 26 November

For details on Parts of Term, please visit: Parts of Term.

Instructor Information

Name:Professor Sean Conte, PhD
E-mail:Sean.Conte@ccd.edu
Office Hours & Location:M/T/W/R 2:00-3:00pm (DCHR 313E)
Zoom link:https://cccs-edu.zoom.us/my/sean.conte
Webex link:https://cccs-meetings.webex.com/meet/sean.conte1
Arts, Communication and Design Pathway Main Phone Number:303-352-6473

Required Text/Course Materials/Technology

Course Calendar

The professor has the right to adjust the content and structure of the course.

Date Unit Topic Reading etc. Assessments
8/17 Introductions None Participation
8/19 What is Morality? Facts & Opinions

McBrayer — Why Our Children Don’t Think There Are Moral Facts (2015)

Skim over:
Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Part 2: Moral Problems

Optional:
Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 1: What Is Morality?

Metaphysics & Epistemology Charts

Participation
8/24 What is Morality? Areas of Ethics Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 1: What Is Morality? Participation
+
What is Morality? Quiz
8/26 Moral Reasoning Conditions

Lecture Notes

Skim over:
Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 2: Moral Reasoning

Participation
8/31 Moral Reasoning Inferences & Reason(s)

Lecture Notes

Skim over:
Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 2: Moral Reasoning

Participation
9/2 Moral Reasoning Validity & Soundness

Lecture Notes

Skim over:
Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 2: Moral Reasoning

Participation

Census date — last day to drop with a refund
9/7 Labor Day — No classes, campus/offices closed
9/9 Moral Reasoning Flex Lecture Notes Participation
+
Moral Reasoning Quiz
9/14 Moral Skepticism Ethical Egoism Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Ethical Egoism” Participation
9/16 Moral Skepticism Cultural Relativism Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Cultural Relativism” Participation
9/21 Moral Skepticism Error Theory Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Error Theory” Participation
9/23 Moral Skepticism Fish bowl discussion

Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism

Optional:
MindScape Podcast — Russ Shafer-Landau on the Reality of Morality

Participation
+
Moral Skepticism Quiz
9/28 The Good Life Hedonism Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life Participation
9/30 The Good Life Desire-satisfaction theory Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life Participation
10/5 The Good Life Objective List Theory None Participation
10/7 The Good Life Fish Bowl Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life Participation
+
Value Theory Quiz
10/12 Consequentialism Consequentialism & Optimization Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism Participation
+
Start Final Paper Notes in Personify
10/14 Consequentialism Sacrifice & Partiality Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism Participation
10/19 Consequentialism Trolley Problem(s) & The Argument From Injustice Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism Participation
10/21 Consequentialism Fish bowl on consequentialism

Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism

Optional:
MindScape Podcast — Joshua Greene on Morality, Psychology, and Trolley Problems

MindScape Podcast — William MacAskill on Maximizing Good in the Present and Future

Participation
+
Consequentialism Quiz
10/26 Kantian Ethics Fairness Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics Participation
10/28 Kantian Ethics Categorical Imperatives Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics Participation
11/2 Kantian Ethics Autonomy & The Limits of Respect Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics Participation
11/4 Kantian Ethics Fishbowl discussion on Kant

Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics

Optional:
MindScape Podcast — Justin Clarke-Doane on Mathematics, Morality, Objectivity, and Reality

Participation
+
Kant Quiz
11/9 Outline Peer Review Instructions for final paper Participation
+
Final Paper Outline
11/11 Virtue Ethics Knowledge-that versus Knowledge-how & Virtues versus Behaviors Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics Participation

11/12 — last day to withdraw
11/16 Virtue Ethics Moral Exemplars & Pluralism versus Subjectivity Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics Participation
11/18 Paper Peer Review Instructions for final paper Participation
+
Final Paper
11/23
11/25
Fall Break — No classes (campus/offices open except Thursday, 11/26)
11/30 Virtue Ethics Fishbowl on Virtue Ethics

Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics

Optional:
Kasulis (1981) — Zen Action, Zen Person, Chapter 9

Participation
+
Virtue Ethics Quiz
12/2 Frontier AI Ethics Lazar (2024) — Aeon “Frontier AI Ethics” Participation
12/7 Final Discussion (optional day) None Revised Final Paper

Course Specific Policies and Information

Attendance

Regular attendance in all course activities is critical for academic success. Please review the College Non-Attendance Policy.

Students establish attendance by completing an academic activity based on course content. As defined by the Federal Department of Education, merely logging into the course site or introducing oneself to the class does not count as attendance. Some examples of successfully attending class include participation in a content-related discussion in class or in the D2L discussion board, taking a quiz, submitting an assignment, or contacting your instructor with a content related question. Students who have not participated by 11:59 PM on the deadline date will be dropped. Similarly, the last date of academic attendance must be reported to Financial Aid for students who do not earn a D or better; students who have not been in regular attendance may experience financial aid ramifications.

See participation below.

No Screens Policy

No screens are permitted in class, including phones, tablets, laptops, and similar devices. This policy directly affects your participation grade. Generally, I will not interrupt class to ask you to put a device away; instead, I will simply deduct participation points. If you have an accommodation that requires use of a device, we will work together to determine an appropriate arrangement.

Course Assignments

Your grade is made up of the following categories:

ActivitiesContribution to Overall Grade
Participation30%
Quizzes30%
Final Paper40%
Personify Notes10%
Outline & Review10%
Paper & Review10%
Revised Paper10%

Participation - The participation grade is earned by actively engaging in the daily in-class activities. These activities include the following: class discussions/debates, peer writing evaluation workshops, group critical analysis sessions, and others.

Quizzes - There are quizzes for every topic we cover, all of which are on D2L. These are due at the end of their respective units. This is meant to allow you significant flexibility, but you still need to stay up to date on them. If you wait till the deadline and some issue arises, you will very likely not get a mass extension on all of the quizzes.

Final Paper - The final paper is where you demonstrate the skills you’ve developed on the question you chose. It is not graded just on the final product, but on how you meet milestones and build on feedback through an iterative process. You will be required to start halfway through the semester, and there will be two peer review sessions (one on outlines and another on the paper itself) to help you develop your ideas and skills.

Late work policies

I grant at most one extension for an assignment, and generally speaking I do not grant mass extensions. That means if you miss submitting an entire unit of quizzes, then I will likely only grant an extension on one. Peer review sessions must be attended to receive credit, and they cannot be made up after the fact.

Each extension is contingent on being professional. As college students, you should recognize yourselves as professional students. (Anything less, and you’re not fully appreciating the level of investment you’re making.) That means I expect you to communicate timely, clearly, and respectfully. In addition, it means you have realistic standards for yourself and your instructors. I will work with you on extensions so long as you are professional in your requests and expectations. Here’s an example of a bad email:

Can you spot all of the errors? The recipient isn’t addressed. There is no signature. It is not clear which class or section the student is in. The first letter isn’t capitalized, and there’s no punctuation. These are all issues that might seem small but show a lack of attention to detail and likewise a lack of respect for the recipient. Worst of all, there is no actual question. It is just a statement, meaning it is asking the recipient (i.e. the instructor) to figure out what you need and what you’re looking for. Finally, this email is way too late. If you (expect to) miss a deadline, you need to handle it as soon as possible. Here is a better approach:

Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Plagiarism. If you are having difficulty with a paper or MLA citations, please communicate with me. I’ll be glad to work with you. Plagiarism, in my view, is something students resort to when they feel desperate. If you are behind, not sure you understand the assignment, are struggling with the assignment, don’t understand how the MLA citation system works, or a similar situation, please get in touch with me. We will work one-on-one to get you back on track. This is a much better solution than turning in work which is not yours. Many students don’t always realize that in academic communities, plagiarism is a serious offense, and is grounds for failing an assignment or course and/or disciplinary action. Plagiarism means copying passages directly from the text of any source, without quotation marks and citations, or not citing summarized or paraphrased information. The written work you submit must be original: written entirely by you alone and not previously submitted in another class. All quotations, summaries and paraphrases (restatements of others’ ideas) need to be cited within your paper. No credit will be given for plagiarized papers and/or assignments. Students who plagiarize will be referred to the Provost.

Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Imagine asking someone, “Hey, I’m hungry. Could you go eat lunch for me?”. You’re not asking if they’ll bring you lunch. You’re asking that they will eat lunch and in doing so satisfy your hunger. Absurd, right? Someone else eating doesn’t do anything for your empty stomach.

Now imagine doing the same for learning. “Hey, I’d like to learn how to swim. Could you learn how for me?” If the only thing that happens is your friend learns how to swim, you should still steer clear of the deep end.

There are some things that cannot be done for you. Learning is one of these things. Your use of external resources -whatever they are- should always be done in service of your learning, helping you master the material and skills better.

Completing assignments with regurgitated LLM responses will not lead to you learning (nor passing).

Other Policies

The professor reserves the right to change this syllabus (and course) at any time.

Grade Scale

A90-100%Superior mastery or achievement.
B80-89%Better than average mastery or achievement.
C70-79%Acceptable mastery or achievement.
D60-69%Less than acceptable mastery or achievement.
FBelow 60%Fails to demonstrate achievement of course objectives.

Point Distribution

This course is weighted by category rather than by a fixed point total. Your overall grade is the weighted average of the categories listed under Course Assignments above: Participation (30%), Quizzes (30%), and the Final Paper sequence (40%, split evenly across four milestones — the Personify Notes, the Outline & Review, the Paper & Review, and the Revised Paper). Individual assignment point values are shown in D2L, and the D2L gradebook is configured to match these weights.

Institutional Outcomes

Graduates of the Community College of Denver are prepared to be successful on a personal, professional, and global level. For a full description of these institutional outcomes please see Institutional Policies module on this courses D2L shell.

In this class we will focus on:

Effective Communication: Students will communicate a central guiding idea to a defined audience, for a concrete purpose, employing effective conventions in the service of meaning.

Critical Thinking: Students will analyze information and ideas from multiple perspectives and articulate an argument or opinion or a conclusion based on that analysis

Intercultural Literacy: Students will apply a set of cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills to effectively interact in a variety of cultural contexts.

Student Resources

CCD has several resources for students. See the list below and/or reach out to the instructor with any needs.

Standard Competencies/Outcomes

  1. Explain major ethical concepts and describe the problems and/or issues in clarifying them that are used to comprehend and express moral or ethical problems.
  2. Analyze major ethical theories.
  3. Explain each major ethical theory from the perspective of a follower to identify what is significant in a particular situation or context for that theory.
  4. Justify how each ethical theory reaches conclusions about what should be done regarding specific moral problems.
  5. Reflect on the logical implications and consequences of the conclusions that each ethical theory reaches.
  6. Demonstrate philosophical and/or logical thinking through writing and other forms of assessment.

Topical Outline

  1. Metaethics
  2. Normative Ethical Theories
  3. Applications of Ethical Theories