PHI-1012-003: Ethics
This abbreviated syllabus must be read together with the material within the Institutional Policies Module of the class D2L shell. Combined, these documents constitute the entire syllabus required for this course.
Guaranteed Transfer (GT) Pathways Course Statement:
The Colorado Commission on Higher Education has approved PHI 1012 for inclusion in the Guaranteed Transfer (GT) Pathways program in the GT-AH3 category. For transferring students, successful completion with a minimum C‒ grade guarantees transfer and application of credit in this GT Pathways category. For more information on the GT Pathways program, go to https://highered.colorado.gov/academics/transfers/gtpathways/curriculum.html.
Welcome to Ethics! In this course we will be delving into core issues about values, rules, and how we should live life. When (if ever) are sacrifices permissible or even mandatory? What sorts of moral consideration do other people/animals/environments deserve? Is there a true, objective morality, or is it all subjective/relative to culture? What constraints should there be on speech, capital punishment, abortion, euthanasia, AI, or immigration (just to name a few)? In this class, we will learn about major approaches to these questions and more. More importantly, we will develop the skills to analyze and evaluate these approaches.
Premier quantum physicist Sean Carroll loves to point out that physics is way easier than ethics. Physics is clean, clear, and under control. Ethics, on the other hand, is blurry, difficult, and extremely hard to do well. We have to work harder. Humans comprise the most complicated systems in the (known) universe. It is no wonder that figuring out the right ways for us to live is challenging.
In this class, we explore some of the biggest questions in ethics and hone the skills that are required to answer them. These include some of the most classic questions in ethics: Is morality objective? What is valuable? What matters more: rules or results? How do we get better at being ethical?
We will discuss each chapter over the course of two weeks. That means you should be reading them at least twice. By the end of the two weeks, you should feel very familiar with the chapter and confident in taking the associated quiz.
The number one tip for success in this class: ENGAGE — attend class, discuss with classmates, stay up to date with D2L, and above all reach out if you run into trouble.
There is a bonus quiz in D2L based on this syllabus. It is the best way to start on a good foot as it gives your grade an early cushion and helps you familiarize yourself with what the course will be like.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions on course logistics or content! I am here to help!
Course Information
| Course Title: | Ethics |
| Credits: | 3 |
| Course Description (from CCNS): |
Examines human life, experience, and thought to discover and develop the principles and values for pursuing a more fulfilled existence. This course examines ethical theories designed to both justify moral judgments, as well as apply these ethical theories to a selection of personal and social issues in the world today. This is a statewide Guaranteed Transfer course in the GT-AH3 category.
| Semester & Year: | Fall 2026 |
| Meeting Location: | Cherry Creek (DCHR) 159 |
| Times & Days: | Tuesday/Thursday, 11:00am-12:15pm |
| Start Date: | 17 August |
| End Date: | 7 December |
| Last date to drop with a refund: | 2 September |
| Last date to withdraw: | 12 November |
| Fall Holidays / Break: | 7 September – Labor Day – No classes, campus/offices closed; 23 November – 27 November – Fall Break – No classes, campus/offices open except Thursday, 26 November |
For details on Parts of Term, please visit: Parts of Term.
Instructor Information
| Name: | Professor Sean Conte, PhD |
| E-mail: | Sean.Conte@ccd.edu |
| Office Hours & Location: | M/T/W/R 2:00-3:00pm (DCHR 313E) |
| Zoom link: | https://cccs-edu.zoom.us/my/sean.conte |
| Webex link: | https://cccs-meetings.webex.com/meet/sean.conte1 |
| Arts, Communication and Design Pathway Main Phone Number: | 303-352-6473 |
Required Text/Course Materials/Technology
- Shafer-Landau, Russ. Living Ethics: An Introduction with Readings. (Any Edition) OUP.
- A PersonifyAI.app subscription (10$ for 1 semester) will be required for writing your final paper. This is non-negotiable and must be purchased early in the semester. YOU MUST USE YOUR SCHOOL EMAIL WHEN REGISTERING. (Further instructions will be provided in class.)
Course Calendar
The professor has the right to adjust the content and structure of the course.
| Date | Unit | Topic | Reading etc. | Assessments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/18 | Introductions | None | Participation | |
| 8/20 | What is Morality? | Facts & Opinions | McBrayer — Why Our Children Don’t Think There Are Moral Facts (2015) Skim over: Optional: |
Participation |
| 8/25 | What is Morality? | Areas of Ethics | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 1: What Is Morality? | Participation + What is Morality? Quiz |
| 8/27 | Moral Reasoning | Conditions | Skim over: |
Participation |
| 9/1 | Moral Reasoning | Inferences & Reason(s) | Skim over: |
Participation 9/2 — Census date; last day to drop with a refund |
| 9/3 | Moral Reasoning | Validity & Soundness | Skim over: |
Participation |
| 9/8 | Moral Reasoning | Flex | Lecture Notes | Participation + Moral Reasoning Quiz |
| 9/10 | Moral Skepticism | Ethical Egoism | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Ethical Egoism” | Participation |
| 9/15 | Moral Skepticism | Cultural Relativism | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Cultural Relativism” | Participation |
| 9/17 | Moral Skepticism | Error Theory | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism, “Error Theory” | Participation |
| 9/22 | Moral Skepticism | Fish bowl discussion | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 3: Moral Skepticism Optional: |
Participation + Moral Skepticism Quiz |
| 9/24 | The Good Life | Hedonism | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life | Participation |
| 9/29 | The Good Life | Desire-satisfaction theory | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life | Participation |
| 10/1 | The Good Life | Objective List Theory | None | Participation |
| 10/6 | The Good Life | Fish Bowl | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 4: The Good Life | Participation + Value Theory Quiz |
| 10/8 | Consequentialism | Consequentialism & Optimization | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism | Participation + Start Final Paper Notes in Personify |
| 10/13 | Consequentialism | Sacrifice & Partiality | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism | Participation |
| 10/15 | Consequentialism | Trolley Problem(s) & The Argument From Injustice | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism | Participation |
| 10/20 | Consequentialism | Fish bowl on consequentialism | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 5: Consequentialism Optional: MindScape Podcast — William MacAskill on Maximizing Good in the Present and Future |
Participation + Consequentialism Quiz |
| 10/22 | Kantian Ethics | Fairness | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics | Participation |
| 10/27 | Kantian Ethics | Categorical Imperatives | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics | Participation |
| 10/29 | Kantian Ethics | Autonomy & The Limits of Respect | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics | Participation |
| 11/3 | Kantian Ethics | Fishbowl discussion on Kant | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 6: Kantian Ethics Optional: |
Participation + Kant Quiz |
| 11/5 | Outline Peer Review | Instructions for final paper | Participation + Final Paper Outline |
|
| 11/10 | Virtue Ethics | Knowledge-that versus Knowledge-how & Virtues versus Behaviors | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics | Participation |
| 11/12 | Virtue Ethics | Moral Exemplars & Pluralism versus Subjectivity | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics | Participation 11/12 — last day to withdraw |
| 11/17 | Virtue Ethics | Fishbowl on Virtue Ethics | Shafer-Landau (2024) — Living Ethics Chapter 10: Virtue Ethics |
Participation + Virtue Ethics Quiz |
| 11/19 | Paper Peer Review | Instructions for final paper | Participation + Final Paper |
|
| 11/24 11/26 |
Fall Break — No classes (campus/offices open except Thursday, 11/26) | |||
| 12/1 | Frontier AI Ethics | Lazar (2024) — Aeon “Frontier AI Ethics” | Participation | |
| 12/3 | Final Discussion (optional day) | None | Revised Final Paper | |
Course Specific Policies and Information
Attendance
Regular attendance in all course activities is critical for academic success. Please review the College Non-Attendance Policy.
Students establish attendance by completing an academic activity based on course content. As defined by the Federal Department of Education, merely logging into the course site or introducing oneself to the class does not count as attendance. Some examples of successfully attending class include participation in a content-related discussion in class or in the D2L discussion board, taking a quiz, submitting an assignment, or contacting your instructor with a content related question. Students who have not participated by 11:59 PM on the deadline date will be dropped. Similarly, the last date of academic attendance must be reported to Financial Aid for students who do not earn a D or better; students who have not been in regular attendance may experience financial aid ramifications.
See participation below.
No Screens Policy
No screens are permitted in class, including phones, tablets, laptops, and similar devices. This policy directly affects your participation grade. Generally, I will not interrupt class to ask you to put a device away; instead, I will simply deduct participation points. If you have an accommodation that requires use of a device, we will work together to determine an appropriate arrangement.
Course Assignments
Your grade is made up of the following categories:
| Activities | Contribution to Overall Grade |
|---|---|
| Participation | 30% |
| Quizzes | 30% |
| Final Paper | 40% |
| Personify Notes | 10% |
| Outline & Review | 10% |
| Paper & Review | 10% |
| Revised Paper | 10% |
Participation - The participation grade is earned by actively engaging in the daily in-class activities. These activities include the following: class discussions/debates, peer writing evaluation workshops, group critical analysis sessions, and others.
Quizzes - There are quizzes for every topic we cover, all of which are on D2L. These are due at the end of their respective units. This is meant to allow you significant flexibility, but you still need to stay up to date on them. If you wait till the deadline and some issue arises, you will very likely not get a mass extension on all of the quizzes.
Final Paper - The final paper is where you demonstrate the skills you’ve developed on the question you chose. It is not graded just on the final product, but on how you meet milestones and build on feedback through an iterative process. You will be required to start halfway through the semester, and there will be two peer review sessions (one on outlines and another on the paper itself) to help you develop your ideas and skills.
Late work policies
I grant at most one extension for an assignment, and generally speaking I do not grant mass extensions. That means if you miss submitting an entire unit of quizzes, then I will likely only grant an extension on one. Peer review sessions must be attended to receive credit, and they cannot be made up after the fact.
Each extension is contingent on being professional. As college students, you should recognize yourselves as professional students. (Anything less, and you’re not fully appreciating the level of investment you’re making.) That means I expect you to communicate timely, clearly, and respectfully. In addition, it means you have realistic standards for yourself and your instructors. I will work with you on extensions so long as you are professional in your requests and expectations. Here’s an example of a bad email:
“hey I missed Thursday three weeks ago”
Can you spot all of the errors? The recipient isn’t addressed. There is no signature. It is not clear which class or section the student is in. The first letter isn’t capitalized, and there’s no punctuation. These are all issues that might seem small but show a lack of attention to detail and likewise a lack of respect for the recipient. Worst of all, there is no actual question. It is just a statement, meaning it is asking the recipient (i.e. the instructor) to figure out what you need and what you’re looking for. Finally, this email is way too late. If you (expect to) miss a deadline, you need to handle it as soon as possible. Here is a better approach:
“Dear Dr. Conte, I hope this finds you well. I am in your PHI-1012-003 class. You may have noticed I was unable to submit my finished paper by the deadline on Thursday (Nov 19). If possible, I would sincerely appreciate an extension to submit the assignment for full or partial credit until the following Tuesday (Nov 24). I understand that it is my responsibility to complete assignments by the due date and there is no guarantee that I get an extension. Thank you for your consideration and have a great day! Billy Pilgrim S0123456789”
Plagiarism and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Plagiarism. If you are having difficulty with a paper or MLA citations, please communicate with me. I’ll be glad to work with you. Plagiarism, in my view, is something students resort to when they feel desperate. If you are behind, not sure you understand the assignment, are struggling with the assignment, don’t understand how the MLA citation system works, or a similar situation, please get in touch with me. We will work one-on-one to get you back on track. This is a much better solution than turning in work which is not yours. Many students don’t always realize that in academic communities, plagiarism is a serious offense, and is grounds for failing an assignment or course and/or disciplinary action. Plagiarism means copying passages directly from the text of any source, without quotation marks and citations, or not citing summarized or paraphrased information. The written work you submit must be original: written entirely by you alone and not previously submitted in another class. All quotations, summaries and paraphrases (restatements of others’ ideas) need to be cited within your paper. No credit will be given for plagiarized papers and/or assignments. Students who plagiarize will be referred to the Provost.
Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Imagine asking someone, “Hey, I’m hungry. Could you go eat lunch for me?”. You’re not asking if they’ll bring you lunch. You’re asking that they will eat lunch and in doing so satisfy your hunger. Absurd, right? Someone else eating doesn’t do anything for your empty stomach.
Now imagine doing the same for learning. “Hey, I’d like to learn how to swim. Could you learn how for me?” If the only thing that happens is your friend learns how to swim, you should still steer clear of the deep end.
There are some things that cannot be done for you. Learning is one of these things. Your use of external resources -whatever they are- should always be done in service of your learning, helping you master the material and skills better.
Completing assignments with regurgitated LLM responses will not lead to you learning (nor passing).
Other Policies
The professor reserves the right to change this syllabus (and course) at any time.
Grade Scale
| A | 90-100% | Superior mastery or achievement. |
| B | 80-89% | Better than average mastery or achievement. |
| C | 70-79% | Acceptable mastery or achievement. |
| D | 60-69% | Less than acceptable mastery or achievement. |
| F | Below 60% | Fails to demonstrate achievement of course objectives. |
Point Distribution
This course is weighted by category rather than by a fixed point total. Your overall grade is the weighted average of the categories listed under Course Assignments above: Participation (30%), Quizzes (30%), and the Final Paper sequence (40%, split evenly across four milestones — the Personify Notes, the Outline & Review, the Paper & Review, and the Revised Paper). Individual assignment point values are shown in D2L, and the D2L gradebook is configured to match these weights.
Institutional Outcomes
Graduates of the Community College of Denver are prepared to be successful on a personal, professional, and global level. For a full description of these institutional outcomes please see Institutional Policies module on this courses D2L shell.
In this class we will focus on:
Effective Communication: Students will communicate a central guiding idea to a defined audience, for a concrete purpose, employing effective conventions in the service of meaning.
Critical Thinking: Students will analyze information and ideas from multiple perspectives and articulate an argument or opinion or a conclusion based on that analysis
Intercultural Literacy: Students will apply a set of cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills to effectively interact in a variety of cultural contexts.
Student Resources
CCD has several resources for students. See the list below and/or reach out to the instructor with any needs.
- Online Tutoring: Sessions are available at Excel! Zone
- Advising: Schedule a virtual appointment with academic advisors by emailing Advising@ccd.edu
- IT Help Desk: Email HelpDesk@ccd.edu or call (303) 352-3030
- Accessibility Center: Please reach out to your Specialist first and/or ccd.access@ccd.edu
- Teaching & Learning Center: D2L Introduction Videos for Students
Standard Competencies/Outcomes
- Explain major ethical concepts and describe the problems and/or issues in clarifying them that are used to comprehend and express moral or ethical problems.
- Analyze major ethical theories.
- Explain each major ethical theory from the perspective of a follower to identify what is significant in a particular situation or context for that theory.
- Justify how each ethical theory reaches conclusions about what should be done regarding specific moral problems.
- Reflect on the logical implications and consequences of the conclusions that each ethical theory reaches.
- Demonstrate philosophical and/or logical thinking through writing and other forms of assessment.
Topical Outline
- Metaethics
- Normative Ethical Theories
- Applications of Ethical Theories